Back to Blog
Aurora sql vs mysql7/2/2023 ![]() ![]() ![]() Amazon Aurora supports MySQL versions 5.6 and 5.7. ![]() Aurora introduced a common storage system, accessed by multiple readers and writers. Replicas are used to distribute readers and writers. Traditional databases were built to mainly execute on a single server. Amazon Aurora has both MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility.įrom an infrastructure perspective, this was a major departure from traditional databases. Later, Amazon Web Service’s came out with Amazon Aurora. Backups are region-local, but can be copied to other regions. You can create DB snapshots, then restore fresh instances from your DB snapshots. RDS has it’s own native DB snapshot method which you can use on your instances.For high-availability, you can choose from stand-alone instances or replicated Multi-AZ instances.Amazon RDS for MySQL supports MySQL versions 5.5 to 8.0.Amazon RDS for MySQLĪmazon Web Service’s first offering is Amazon RDS for MySQL. There are enough differences between the three that I will be separating them. Amazon Web ServicesĪWS offers three different options for MySQL: I also want to add that I am not comparing the performance of each service. This comparison only includes managed services, and does not include such host-your-own implementations. Let’s take a closer look.įirst off, I want to prefix this comparison by saying that in the case of all three providers, you can host MySQL on your own instances/VMs. As an added complexity, AWS provides three different MySQL services, each one of them different. The available versions and features vary from provider to provider. It comes in many flavours, including Enterprise and Community editions.Īmazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform all provide their own managed MySQL services. MySQL is a popular open-sourced relational database server. Comparing Managed MySQL Services on AWS, Azure, and GCP ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |